In Classroom of Future, Stagnant Scores

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/04/technology/technology-in-schools-faces-questions-on-value.html?pagewanted=all

Grading the Digital School: In Classroom of Future, Stagnant Scores
by Matt Richtel
New York Times
Business Day
Technology
September 3, 2011

This article outlines the issues with technology in classrooms and stagnant test scores. Kyrene Schools in Chandler, Arizona were highlighted. Classrooms in this district have plenty of technological resources, however, their test scores have not improved. This is where the controversy lies. Some opponents say that if the new resources are not improving student achievement, it should be discouraged. Proponents claim that test scores may not have improved but, students are getting more enriching opportunities through the technology resources provided to them. Opponents of technology also claim that students don't emotionally interact with technology as they do with paper and print material. They also say that technology replaces the time students would otherwise be interacting with a teacher. Other's claim that technology may distract from learning instead of help with instruction. Funding is another big issue. Schools are spending generously on technology while budgets for teachers an other supplies has been severely cut in the past few years. Schools are not allowed to spend technology money on anything other than technology. This concepts frustrates teachers and parents of some districts. Technology money attracts vendors to district representatives. They attempt to sell new technology resources or upgrade existing resources and encourage districts to spend, spend, spend. Parents are attracted to schools that are equipped well with the newest technology. However, when faced with tax increases or bond issues, they feel conflicted.

Review by Amy Long